Introduction
Electro Static
Chuck (ESC) is based on the force of attraction between charged plates
of a capacitor. For designing ESCs, the ESC can be regarded as a capacitor
with a conductive plate (The Lower Electrode), an insulating layer
(Coating on the Electrode), and another conductive plate (The Wafer).
To maximize the clamping force out of few factors, the insulating.
Material needs to have as high a dielectric constant as possible.
Polyimide as insulating source is widely applied for the industry.
Although it has shown some weaker points at manufacturing sites such
as lifetime, handling attention for cleaning ESC and process of assembling
chamber.
To alternate these difficulties, Ceramic Coated ESC has been developed
without a minimal change of present procedure.
Polyimide vs.
Ceramic Coating
Adopting of a dielectric
material is considered by electrical properties, the workability to
a thin quality film, and the ability to clamping force under high
voltage.
The following table shows the properties of some typical insulating
sources.
|
Property
|
Quartz
|
Sapphire
|
Polyimide
|
Alumina
(Ceramic)
|
|
Dielectric
Constant
|
3.8
|
7.5
- 10.5
|
3.4
|
9
- 10
|
|
Thermal
Conductivity
|
1.46
|
42
|
0.1
- 0.35
|
35
|
|
Thermal
Melting Temperature
|
1100
|
1800
|
320
|
1800
|
The higher the
dielectric constants, the thicker the insulating layer can be. The
thicker insulator makes the ESC's lifetime last longer.
Capability of absorbing the heat from plasma operating is one of ability
of elements to reduce the "Shorts" from contamination on
the surface of ESC.
Polyimide ESC
Polyimide has been
quite an adequate material for the dielectric layer to manufacturing
of ESC's.
However, Polyimide ESC has suffered from following difficulties on
operating sites.
Separation
between polyimide film and pedestal around edge rim - causing from
losing adhesive's ability. Figure 1 - B
Exposure of
aluminum around edge rim from worn-out of thin coating over pedestal
body - causing from cleaning & plasma. Figure 1 - C
Vulnerable
material to heat and physical impacts from normal handling procedures
needs a great attention for contamination free between a wafer and
ESC and installing or carrying. Figure 1 - A
Space between
polyimide and edge rim causes an unstable temperature transferring
from pedestal to wafer. Figure 1 - D

Ceramic Coated
ESC
Plasma aided
ceramic spraying method was chosen for the durable lifetime and
handling of ESC under harsh environments.
Following are changes made from the conventional polyimide ESC's.
Thicker layers
- The higher dielectric constant can make the top layer thicker
for the adequate clamping force.
Protected
edge rim - The rim is coated with 10 times thicken than the conventional
ESCs.
Solid material
- Ceramic in nature is resistant to heat and physical contact under
normal procedure.
High thermal
conductivity - With full coverage of top surface, cooling. The wafer
is much effective for stable and uniform temperature control from
edge to center.

Benefits of
Ceramic Coated ESC
- Achieves
uniform and stable wafer temperature control.
- Improves
etch uniformity near the edge of the wafer.
- Extends lifetime
of ESC for 3 - 5 times longer.
- Reduces "Shorts"
caused from contaminations and scratches which might happened during
installing, carrying and cleaning.
- Eliminates
worn-outs of edge rim.
- Operates
under the present recipe without any alterations.
Test Results
Testing Equipment
Applied Materials: LTD.
Centra 5200 Poly MXP
Testing ESC
1. Polyimide ESC
2. Ceramic Coated ESC
Helium Pressure
& Leaking Test
As results,
helium leakage of Ceramic ESC was a bit less than the polyimide's.
Otherwise, both of ESCs were mostly identical in rest of them.
Dechucking
time of ceramic ESC was 2 seconds longer compared to 5 seconds of
polyimide's.
|
HE
PRESS
|
HE
FLOW
|
HE
LEAK
|
ESC
VDC
|
|
|
CERAMIC
|
POLYIMIDE
|
CERAMIC
|
POLYIMIDE
|
CERAMIC
|
POLYIMIDE
|
|
4
|
5.6
|
7.4
|
0.3
|
0.4
|
1588
|
1576
|
|
6
|
9.3
|
12.9
|
0.6
|
0.5
|
1588
|
1576
|
|
8
|
13.9
|
19.8
|
0.7
|
0.9
|
1588
|
1576
|
|
10
|
19.7
|
28
|
1.1
|
0.8
|
1588
|
1576
|
|
12
|
34.3
|
37.3
|
0.8
|
1
|
1588
|
1576
|
|
14
|
43.1
|
48
|
1.4
|
1
|
1588
|
1576
|

|
HIGH
VOLTAGE
|
HE
FLOW
|
HE
LEAK
|
ESC
VDC
|
ESC
A
|
|
|
CERAMIC
|
POLYIMIDE
|
CERAMIC
|
POLYIMIDE
|
CERAMIC
|
POLYIMIDE
|
CERAMIC
|
POLYIMIDE
|
|
400
|
19.9
|
21.2
|
1.3
|
2.2
|
423
|
423
|
47
|
47
|
|
600
|
19.7
|
20.8
|
1.3
|
1.9
|
623
|
623
|
70
|
70
|
|
800
|
19.6
|
20.5
|
0.7
|
1.4
|
823
|
811
|
82
|
82
|
|
1000
|
19.5
|
20.2
|
0.4
|
1.2
|
1011
|
1000
|
105
|
105
|
|
1200
|
19.5
|
20
|
0.4
|
1.1
|
1200
|
1200
|
129
|
129
|
|
1400
|
19.5
|
19.8
|
0.4
|
0.8
|
1400
|
1400
|
141
|
141
|
|
1600
|
19.3
|
19.6
|
0.2
|
0.5
|
1588
|
1576
|
164
|
164
|
|
1800
|
19.2
|
19.5
|
0.1
|
0.6
|
1788
|
1776
|
176
|
176
|

|
TIME
(MIN)
|
ESC
VDC
|
ESC
A
|
HE
FLOW
|
HE
LEAK
|
|
1
|
1011
|
105
|
19.5
|
0.6
|
|
2
|
1011
|
105
|
19.4
|
0.3
|
|
3
|
1011
|
105
|
19.3
|
0.3
|
|
4
|
1011
|
105
|
19.3
|
0.3
|
|
5
|
1011
|
105
|
19.3
|
0.3
|
|
6
|
1011
|
105
|
19.2
|
0.2
|
|
7
|
1011
|
105
|
19.2
|
0.2
|
|
8
|
1011
|
105
|
19.2
|
0.2
|
|
9
|
1011
|
105
|
19.2
|
0.2
|
|
10
|
1011
|
105
|
19.2
|
0.2
|

Process Test
Poly Etching
rate for Uniformity
Non-Pattern
poly wafer
Results
Uniformities
of the both ESCs' are almost similar to each other. The 2 second
longer dechucking time of ceramic ESC's made some differences on
etching results.
|
|